Use case

Tamper-proof records that hold up when both sides disagree.

Sigilbase creates tamper-proof records of the events that matter in a dispute, such as a notice served or a deliverable submitted. Each event is hashed, chained and sealed into a signed checkpoint, so you can prove a record was not altered after the fact. Verification needs no trust in Sigilbase, and no account.

The problem
01

When a deal turns sour, each side produces its own version of what happened and when.

02

A timestamp in your own system proves nothing to a counterparty who assumes you could have changed it.

03

Proving you served notice on a date can decide a claim, yet the proof usually rests on trust.

How it maps

The Sigilbase event model, applied to a served notice.

Sigilbase records each disputable moment as one event: an actor, an action, and a payload. Examples include a notice served, a deliverable submitted, an SLA breach observed, or terms accepted. Here a company records serving a notice of breach.

POST /v1/events
{
  "actor":  "org:acme-ltd",
  "action": "notice.served",
  "payload": {
    "counterparty":    "org:widgetco",
    "matter":          "contract:2024-118",
    "document_sha256": "c41b…7d02",
    "method":          "email+post",
    "reference":       "notice-of-breach-03"
  }
}
Chain

Sigilbase hashes each event with SHA-256 and chains it to the previous one, so the record of when you served notice cannot be moved or edited without breaking every hash after it.

Seal and verify

Sigilbase seals recent events into a signed checkpoint every few minutes, and either party can recompute the chain and signatures offline with the standalone verifier.

Why provable beats logged

A log records events. Sigilbase makes them provable.

How a record in one party's system compares with a Sigilbase record.
Question A record in your system Sigilbase
Can either side rewrite the record in its favour? Yes, each keeps its own copy No, any change breaks verification
Can the counterparty verify without trusting you? No, they must accept your word Yes, offline with the standalone verifier
Does the proof survive the vendor disappearing? No, it lives in one party's system Yes, the evidence bundle verifies on its own
Is each event sealed and independently checkable? No Yes, in a signed checkpoint
When neither side trusts the other

The record holds even when you and the counterparty disagree.

Both sides, one provable record

Sigilbase gives both parties the same sealed record, so a dispute is no longer your word against theirs. Each side can hold the evidence bundle and check it, and a tampered copy fails verification on either desk.

Verification needs no trust in Sigilbase

Sigilbase is not a party you have to believe. The standalone verifier runs offline and depends on nothing from us, so the counterparty confirms a record was not altered without taking Sigilbase, or you, on trust.

Roots placed beyond even our reach Business-tier

On the Business tier, Sigilbase publishes each checkpoint root to an external, public anchor, placing those roots beyond even our reach so verification never depends on records we could later change.

FAQ

Questions about dispute-proof records.

What are tamper-proof records?

Tamper-proof records are records you can prove were not changed after they were made. Sigilbase creates them by hashing each event, chaining it to the one before, and sealing it into a signed checkpoint. Any later edit, deletion or reordering breaks verification, so the record either checks out intact or it does not.

How do I prove a record was not altered?

You prove it by running the standalone verifier against the evidence bundle. The verifier recomputes the hash chain and checks the signatures offline, and it reports the exact sequence number of any record that fails. Because the bundle carries its own proofs and public keys, the other side can run the same check independently.

Can the other side verify the record without trusting me or Sigilbase?

Yes. Verification uses an open-source standalone verifier that runs offline and depends on nothing from you or from Sigilbase. The counterparty checks the evidence bundle themselves, so the proof does not rest on either party's good faith.

Is a Sigilbase record admissible as legal evidence?

Tamper-evidence can strengthen the evidential integrity of a record, but admissibility and the weight given to evidence are decided by the court and depend on the jurisdiction and the facts of the case. We are not lawyers and offer no legal advice. What Sigilbase provides is a technical guarantee, verifiable by anyone, that a record was not altered after it was sealed.

What kinds of events can I record?

You can record any event that might later be disputed, such as a notice served, a deliverable submitted, an SLA breach observed, or terms accepted. Sigilbase seals whatever fields you put in the event payload, including a hash of an attached document. What each record contains is up to you.

Join the waitlist

Building now. Early access for teams that need records both sides can trust.

No spam, one email when it opens.

Privacy

Sigilbase is pre-launch. This page collects one thing: an email address, if you choose to join the waitlist.

Waitlist emails are used to send one announcement when access opens, and nothing else. No marketing lists, no sharing, no profiling.

This site runs no analytics or trackers. To protect the waitlist form from automated abuse we use Cloudflare Turnstile, a privacy-preserving challenge from our hosting provider; it may set a temporary cookie for that purpose and is not used to track or profile you. When you join the waitlist, your email address is sent to our own signup endpoint and stored on our behalf by Cloudflare. It is not shared with anyone else.

To have your email removed, contact hello@sigilbase.io.

Data controller: Sigilbase, United Kingdom.

Last updated July 2026